| Note |
Although the name of the proconsul cannot be read, owing to the poor state of the coin, it seems reasonably likely that it is a coin of Attius Laco, since it has the same rev. type as the smaller denomination (2052) and since the obv. is so close to 2050 (though of a different die). The rev. inscription has been scraped off as on 2057/2 (cf. 2056). –– Corr.: C. Howgego (JRS 1993, p. 202) suggests that the erasure of the legend makes it more likely that this is a coin of Tarquitius Priscus, for whom erased coins are known.
|