|
1
|
1
|
|
|
Mu |
|
20 |
3.44 |
12 |
Original comment: "There must be a suspicion that the coin has been altered from a specimen of Domitia (as 1062), but there is no definite sign of alteration." But now see new specimen.
|
Show
|
|
2
|
2
✸
|
|
|
|
CGT coll. |
19 |
5.08 |
12 |
The obv. legend is still illegible, but this coin proves that the Mu coin (1061/1) was not altered
|
Show
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
Tricarico coll. |
|
|
|
|
Show
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
|
|
Opisthodomos 1, 1 May 2022, lot 405 |
18 |
4.70 |
|
rev. legend not clear but it seems to be this type
|
Show
|