Note |
Anomalous in several ways, and regarded by Ganschow, p. 162, as probably irregular and plated. But the existence of the second specimen, from the same obv. die, with a Mount Argaeus reverse (https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/type/66378) makes it seems more likely to be authentic, if still odd. The rev. die seems to be the same as used on a coin of Caracalla https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coin/314884.
|